Key result
Clinical prediction rules including the Wells score are recommended to estimate pre-test DVT and PE probability.
Why the study?
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism present diagnostic challenges requiring estimation of clinical probability before testing to ensure efficient, safe, and cost-effective diagnosis.
How should clinical prediction rules be used to estimate the probability of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism?
How should clinical prediction rules be used to estimate the probability of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism?
Clinical prediction rules, such as the Wells score, are essential for estimating the pretest probability of DVT and PE to guide efficient and cost-effective diagnostic testing.
May improve VTE diagnostic efficiency via pretest probability rules; leaves open optimal rule selection in contemporary cohorts.
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are potentially life-threatening problems that present diagnostic challenges. To employ objective diagnostic tests in an efficient, safe, and cost-effective manner, the clinical probability of these disorders should be estimated before testing. A number of clinical prediction rules are available for suspected deep venous thrombosis, while there are three major prediction rules available for estimating the probability of pulmonary embolism. Recent modifications of the Wells score for deep venous thrombosis simplify its use. Although the Wells score for pulmonary embolism is commonly used, two other rules are useful for this disorder as well. This review summarizes the clinical prediction rules and gives recommendations about their application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dan Hunt (2007) conducted a review in Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Clinical prediction rules was evaluated. Clinical prediction rules, including the Wells score, are recommended for estimating the clinical probability of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism before objective diagnostic testing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: