Key result
High co-payments linked to up to ~53% lower 1-year adherence for GLP1-RA and SGLT2i therapies.
Why the study?
GLP1-RA and SGLT2i improve outcomes in T2D and HF, but high out-of-pocket costs may reduce medication adherence.
Does higher prescription co-payment reduce medication adherence to GLP1-RA and SGLT2i therapies in patients with heart failure and/or type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=94,610)
Does higher prescription co-payment reduce medication adherence to GLP1-RA and SGLT2i therapies in patients with heart failure and/or type 2 diabetes?
Odds Ratio: 0.47 (95% CI 0.44–0.51)
Higher out-of-pocket prescription costs are significantly associated with reduced 1-year adherence to guideline-directed GLP1-RA and SGLT2i therapies in patients with diabetes and heart failure.
High co-payment was associated with lower adherence to GLP1-RA and SGLT2i; leaves open whether cost-reduction policies improve outcomes in HF or T2D.
Importance: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and heart failure (HF) prevalence are rising in the US. Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve outcomes for these conditions, high out-of-pocket costs may be associated with reduced medication adherence. Objective: To compare 1-year adherence to GLP1-RA and SGLT2i therapies by prescription co-payment level in individuals with T2D and/or HF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified data from Optum Insight's Clinformatics Data Mart Database of enrollees with commercial and Medicare health insurance plans. Individuals aged 18 years or older with T2D and/or HF who had a prescription claim for a GLP1-RA or SLGT2i from January 1, 2014, to September 30, 2020, were included. Exposures: Prescription co-payment, categorized as low (<$10), medium ($10 to<$50), and high (≥$50). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was medication adherence, defined as a proportion of days covered (PDC) of 80% or greater at 1 year. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between co-payment and adherence, adjusting for patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Results: A total of 94 610 individuals (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [11.4] years; 51 226 [54.1%] male) were prescribed GLP1-RA or SGLT2i therapy. Overall, 39 149 individuals had a claim for a GLP1-RA, of whom 25 557 (65.3%) had a PDC of 80% or greater at 1 year. In fully adjusted models, individuals with a medium (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.67) or high (AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51) co-payment were less likely to have a PDC of 80% or greater with a GLP1-RA compared with those with a low co-payment. Overall, 51 072 individuals had a claim for an SGLT2i, of whom 37 339 (73.1%) had a PDC of 80% or greater at 1 year. Individuals with a medium (AOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.63-0.72) or high (AOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63-0.72) co-payment were less likely to have a PDC of 80% or greater with an SGLT2i compared with those with a low co-payment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals with T2D and/or HF, 1-year adherence to GLP1-RA or SGLT2i therapies was highest among individuals with a low co-payment. Improving adherence to guideline-based therapies may require interventions that reduce out-of-pocket prescription costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Essien et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes and/or heart failure (n=94,610). Medium or high prescription co-payment vs. Low prescription co-payment (<$10) was evaluated on Medication adherence, defined as a proportion of days covered (PDC) of 80% or greater at 1 year (AOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.44-0.51). High prescription co-payments (≥$50) were associated with lower 1-year medication adherence compared with low co-payments (<$10) for both GLP1-RA (AOR 0.47) and SGLT2i (AOR 0.68) therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: