Key result
IVUS-derived virtual PFFR shows a good 0.64 correlation with actual PFFR in femoropopliteal artery lesions.
Why the study?
While fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be estimated by intravascular imaging in coronary arteries, data are lacking for estimated FFR in extremity arteries.
Can peripheral fractional flow reserve (PFFR) be accurately estimated using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in femoropopliteal artery lesions?
Cross-Sectional (n=6)
No
Can peripheral fractional flow reserve (PFFR) be accurately estimated using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in femoropopliteal artery lesions?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Virtual peripheral fractional flow reserve can be estimated from IVUS analysis in the superficial femoral artery, offering a potential new method for hemodynamic assessment without a pressure wire.
Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be estimated by analysis of intravascular imaging in a coronary artery; however, there are no data for estimated FFR in an extremity artery. The aim of this concept-generating study was to determine whether it is possible to estimate the value of peripheral FFR (PFFR) by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis also in femoropopliteal artery lesions. Methods Between April 2022 and February 2023, PFFR was measured before endovascular therapy in 31 stenotic femoropopliteal artery lesions. High-definition IVUS measurement was simultaneously performed in automatic pullback mode in 6 of those 31 lesions. IVUS-derived PFFR was calculated by an algorithm based on fluid dynamics as the following equation: ΔP = FV + SV2. F is the coefficient of pressure loss because of viscous friction (Poiseuille’s equation) and S is the coefficient of local pressure loss because of flow separation (Bernoulli’s equation). The values of F and S were calculated by analysis of IVUS. V is velocity and the value of V was obtained from previously reported data in a duplex ultrasound study. The mean pressure was assumed to be 80 mmHg, and IVUS-derived PFFR was calculated by the following equation: IVUS-derived PFFR = (80 – ΔP) / 80. Results The values of IVUS-derived PFFR and actual PFFR were similar: 0.73 and 0.72, 0.87 and 0.92, 0.90 and 0.92, 0.66 and 0.73, and 0.79 and 0.72, respectively. In one case in which run-off of the below-the-knee artery was poor, PFFR (0.91) was higher than the IVUS-derived PFFR (0.73). Conclusion Virtual PFFR in the superficial femoral artery can be estimated from IVUS analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimada et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Stenotic femoropopliteal artery lesions (n=6). IVUS-derived virtual peripheral fractional flow reserve (PFFR) vs. Actual PFFR measured by pressure microcatheter was evaluated on Correlation between IVUS-derived PFFR and actual PFFR (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.64). IVUS-derived virtual peripheral fractional flow reserve showed a relatively good correlation with actual peripheral fractional flow reserve (Spearman's rho 0.64) in femoropopliteal artery lesions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: