Key result
Antitachycardia pacing ICDs linked to ~22% fewer first shocks versus standard ICDs.
Why the study?
Does antitachycardia pacing ICD reduce first shock occurrence and improve survival compared to standard ICDs?
Cohort (n=1,795)
Does antitachycardia pacing ICD reduce first shock occurrence and improve survival compared to standard ICDs?
The addition of antitachycardia pacing to ICD therapy significantly limits the occurrence of first ICD shock without adversely affecting mortality.
UNLABELLED: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) currently undergoing clinical investigation incorporate antitachycardia pacing capabilities, but little is known about their effect on patient selection and outcome. The Bilitch registry database was reviewed to compare the 1,553 patients who initially received standard devices with the 242 patients initially implanted with antitachycardia pacing ICDs (ANT). Baseline characteristics including mean age, ejection fraction, sex, type of cardiac disease, and percent presenting with sudden cardiac death were reviewed. Cumulative first shock occurrence and survival from arrhythmic and all cause mortality were calculated for the two groups. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups except that the ANT population had a greater male predominance and initially presented with a lower sudden cardiac death incidence (P < 0.05). Cumulative occurrence of first shock was significantly lower in the ANT group up to 24 months of follow-up (28% vs 36%, P < 0.05). ANT group survival from arrhythmic death (99% vs 96%) and all cause mortality (89% vs 94%) was significantly higher at 24 months of follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of antitachycardia pacing to ICD therapy appears to significantly limit the occurrence of first ICD shock without adversely affecting mortality in a patient population similar to those implanted with standard ICDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gross et al. (1993) conducted a cohort in Patients requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=1,795). Antitachycardia pacing ICDs vs. Standard ICDs was evaluated on Cumulative occurrence of first shock (p=< 0.05). Antitachycardia pacing ICDs significantly reduced the cumulative occurrence of first shock compared to standard ICDs at 24 months (28% vs 36%, P<0.05), without adversely affecting mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: