Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 16, 2013International Endodontic Journal

Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with H yflex CM and R evo‐ S rotary nickel–titanium instruments

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SBSebastian BürkleinLBL. BörjesESEdgar Schäfer

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Bürklein et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa92dc6bd00adaa8902c4eahttps://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12171
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel‐titanium instruments2006 · 36 citations
  2. 2Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel–titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth2004 · 188 citations
  3. 3Roentgenographic Investigation of Frequency and Degree of Canal Curvatures in Human Permanent Teeth2002 · 256 citations
  4. 4Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means2005 · 849 citations