Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autoimmune-associated epilepsy (AAE) is an increasingly-recognized condition in which seizures result from immune-mediated mechanisms, such as Rasmussen's encephalitis and antibody-associated epilepsies. Its timely identification may enable more efficacious therapy and improve outcomes. The current paper aims to provide a clinically-oriented review of AAE, focusing on clinical identification, use of diagnostic scoring systems, and immunological testing strategies. Antibody-associated epilepsy encompasses a broad spectrum of presentations, from postencephalitic epilepsy to isolated drug-resistant temporal-lobe epilepsy. Neuronal-surface autoantibodies (such as anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR), anti- leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (anti-LGI1), anti-CASPR2) and intracellular antibodies (such as anti-GAD65) are variably associated with pathogenesis and chronicity. Clinical scoring systems (such as Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy - APE2, Antibody Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms - ACES, ntibody Prevalence in Epilepsy before Surgery - APES, Antibody in Drug-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - ARTE and 'Obvious' Indications for Neural Antibody Testing in Epilepsy or Seizures - ONES) are helpful in selecting patients for autoantibody testing. A comprehensive workup includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, prolonged electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and combined serum/CSF antibody panels. Testing methodology and antibody type must be carefully interpreted in the light of clinical context. In low-resource settings, cost-effective testing strategies and clinical-screening tools are crucial to optimize the diagnostic yield. Early clinical suspicion, guided use of diagnostic scores, and appropriate immunological investigation are central to manage AAE. Recognizing AAE as a distinct diagnostic category is essential to improve care and guide immunotherapeutic decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frezatti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: