Key result
Ciprofol maintains lowest SBP ~13 mmHg higher vs propofol during anesthesia induction in frail women.
Why the study?
Most clinical experience with ciprofol was based on robust populations, leaving its efficacy and safety during anesthesia induction unstudied in frail female patients.
Does ciprofol improve hemodynamic stability compared to propofol during anesthesia induction in frail female patients?
RCT (n=69)
Double-blind
Random number table
No
Does ciprofol improve hemodynamic stability compared to propofol during anesthesia induction in frail female patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 103% vs 90%
p-value: p=<0.001
Ciprofol provides comparable anesthesia induction efficacy to propofol with better hemodynamic stability and less injection pain in frail female patients.
Supports preferring ciprofol over propofol for induction in frail females; extends RCT evidence on hemodynamic stability in this population.
BACKGROUND: Ciprofol, a recently developed anesthetic agent, is not inferior to propofol in terms of efficacy and safety. However, most previous clinical experience with ciprofol was based on a robust population. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ciprofol for anesthesia induction in female patients with frailty. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial included patients with frailty undergoing elective general anesthesia for gynecological surgery. Frailty was assessed using the modified frailty index. The patients were randomly administered propofol (2 mg/kg) or ciprofol (0.5 mg/kg) during anesthesia induction. The depth of anaesthesia was continually monitored by the bispectral index. The primary outcome was the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) during anesthesia induction. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of general anesthesia induction failure and adverse events. RESULTS: Among the 69 enrolled patients with frailty, 67 were included in the final analysis. The success rate of anesthesia induction was 100% in both groups. The lowest SBP was significantly higher in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group (103 [96-110] vs. 90 [85-98] mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001), suggesting that the former caused less inhibition of hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients with frailty. The incidence of injection pain was lower in the ciprofol group than in the propofol group (3 [8.8%] vs. 11 patients [33.3%], respectively; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the efficacy of ciprofol for inducing general anesthesia in patients with frailty is comparable to that of propofol, with more stable hemodynamics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered, before patient enrollment, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) (Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2300075271; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=205160 , principal investigator's name: Zifeng Xu, date of registration: 31/08/2023).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Frailty requiring general anesthesia for gynecological surgery (n=69). Ciprofol vs. Propofol (2 mg/kg) was evaluated on Lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) during anesthesia induction (p=<0.001). Ciprofol resulted in a significantly higher lowest systolic blood pressure compared to propofol (103 vs. 90 mmHg, P < 0.001) during general anesthesia induction in frail female patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: