Why the study?
The relative diagnostic value of TTE and MSCT for anatomical assessment in Tetralogy of Fallot, particularly in infants, remains an area of active investigation.
How do transthoracic echocardiography and multislice computed tomography compare in diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of infants with Tetralogy of Fallot?
Observational (n=35)
No
How do transthoracic echocardiography and multislice computed tomography compare in diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of infants with Tetralogy of Fallot?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 50%
While TTE is reliable for intracardiac assessment in infants with Tetralogy of Fallot, MSCT provides superior sensitivity for delineating extracardiac structures such as coronary anomalies and collateral arteries.
TTE remains first-line for intracardiac TOF assessment in infants; leaves open whether routine MSCT improves preoperative planning beyond targeted extracardiac queries.
Background: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most common cyanotic congenital heart disease, requiring precise anatomical assessment for optimal surgical planning. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) are widely used imaging modalities for TOF evaluation, yet their relative diagnostic value, particularly in infants, remains an area of active investigation. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of TTE and MSCT in assessing intracardiac and extracardiac abnormalities in infants with TOF, with surgical findings as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted on 35 infants diagnosed with TOF who underwent both TTE and 128-slice MSCT before surgical repair. Imaging findings were compared with intraoperative measurements, evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and agreement (Cohen's kappa) between modalities. Results: < 0.001). In contrast, MSCT exhibited superior sensitivity in detecting extracardiac abnormalities, including coronary artery anomalies (100 vs. 50%) and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries (90 vs. 25%). While higher-generation MSCT scanners offer improved image resolution, the use of a 128-slice MSCT scanner proved to be a feasible alternative when more advanced technology is unavailable. Conclusion: TTE remains a reliable imaging modality for intracardiac assessment and is not inferior to MSCT in evaluating cardiac deformities in TOF. However, MSCT provides superior anatomical delineation of extracardiac structures, making it valuable for comprehensive preoperative planning. Despite its operator dependency, TTE remains the preferred first-line imaging tool due to its noninvasiveness and real-time functional assessment, whereas MSCT serves as a complementary modality, particularly for extracardiac evaluation. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts are warranted to refine imaging protocols and optimize TOF assessment strategies in infants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Van et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Tetralogy of Fallot (n=35). Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated on Sensitivity in detecting coronary artery anomalies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: