Key result
High trait ruminators show elevated baseline cognitive control network connectivity but blunted increases following stress.
Why the study?
The relations of functional connectivity and rumination after stress induction remain mixed and unclear.
Does stress induction alter functional connectivity in the cognitive control network differently in high versus low trait ruminators?
Observational (n=45)
No
Does stress induction alter functional connectivity in the cognitive control network differently in high versus low trait ruminators?
High trait ruminators exhibit a lack of functional connectivity reactivity within the cognitive control network following stress, potentially reflecting reduced network integration for emotion regulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attenuated stress reactivity in high ruminators may signal impaired emotion regulation; leaves open whether rumination-targeted interventions restore network dynamics.
Rumination is a perseverative thinking style that is associated with adverse mental and physical health. Stressful situations have been considered as a trigger for this kind of thinking. Until today, there are mixed findings with respect to the relations of functional connectivity (FC) and rumination. The study at hand aimed to investigate, in how far high and low ruminators would show elevated levels of state rumination after a stress induction and if these changes would show corresponding changes in FC in the cognitive control network (CCN) and dorsal attention network (DAN). 23 high and 22 low trait ruminators underwent resting-state measurements before and after a stress induction with the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Changes in rsFC through the TSST were measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy within and between regions of the CCN. Stress successfully induced state rumination in both groups but stronger in the high trait ruminators. High trait ruminators showed elevated FC within the CCN at baseline, but attenuated increase in FC following the TSST. Increases in FC correlated negatively with state rumination. A lack of FC reactivity within the CCN in high ruminators might reflect reduced network integration between brain regions necessary for emotion regulation and cognitive control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenbaum et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Trait rumination (n=45). High trait rumination vs. Low trait rumination was evaluated on Time by group interaction for within-region functional connectivity in the right dlPFC following stress induction (η² = 0.16, p=<0.01). High trait ruminators showed elevated functional connectivity within the cognitive control network at baseline but an attenuated increase in functional connectivity following stress induction compared to low ruminators.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: