Key result
LUS-guided care increases dry-weight reduction by ~3-fold vs standard care, driving reverse cardiac remodeling.
Why the study?
LVH and dysfunction are prevalent and carry adverse outcomes in hemodialysis patients, but the long-term effects of lung ultrasound-guided dry-weight reduction on LV mass and function were unknown.
Does lung ultrasound-guided dry-weight reduction improve echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular mass and function in clinically euvolemic hypertensive hemodialysis patients?
RCT (n=71)
randomized
Does lung ultrasound-guided dry-weight reduction improve echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular mass and function in clinically euvolemic hypertensive hemodialysis patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 71.4% vs 22.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Lung ultrasound-guided dry-weight reduction in hemodialysis patients is associated with reverse left ventricular and left atrial remodeling over 12 months.
Supports lung US-guided dry-weight reduction to promote cardiac remodeling in hypertensive HD patients; extends volume management evidence from RCTs.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and dysfunction are highly prevalent in hemodialysis patients and are independently associated with adverse outcomes. This study examines the long-term effects of dry-weight reduction with a standardized lung ultrasound (LUS)-guided strategy on echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular (LV) mass and function in hemodialysis patients. Seventy-one clinically euvolemic hemodialysis patients with hypertension were randomized to dry-weight reduction guided by pre-hemodialysis LUS (n = 35) or standard-of-care treatment (n = 36) and were followed-up for 12 months. Two-dimensional and tissue-Doppler echocardiographies (TDI) were performed at the baseline and 12-month evaluations. During follow-up, dry-weight reduction took place in more patients in the active arm than in the control arm of the trial (71.4% vs 22.2%; p < 0.001). Left atrial (LA) surface (−1.37 ± 4.50 vs 1.28 ± 5.00 cm2; P = 0.006) and LA volume index (−3.22 ± 11.82 vs 4.76 ± 12.83 ml/m2; P = 0.009) decreased in the active and increased in the control group. LV end-diastolic volume (−0.94 ± 11.45 vs 6.58 ± 13.92 ml/m2; P = 0.015) decreased only in the active group. The LV mass index was unchanged in the active (134.21 ± 44.75 vs 133.57 ± 45.51; P = 0.844) and marginally increased in the control group (134.21 ± 40.96 vs 143.77 ± 50.04 g/m2; P = 0.089). The LV E/e' wave ratio was unchanged in the active (12.45 ± 4.69 vs 12.56 ± 4.89; P = 0.521) and increased in the usual-care group (10.91 ± 4.97 vs12.36 ± 6.43; P = 0.003). LV systolic function did not differ between the two study arms across the trial. Over 12 months, LUS-guided dry-weight reduction is associated with reverse LV and LA remodeling, myocardial hypertrophy regression, and improved LV diastolic filling properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loutradis et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Clinically euvolemic hemodialysis patients with hypertension (n=71). Lung ultrasound (LUS)-guided dry-weight reduction vs. Standard-of-care treatment was evaluated on Dry-weight reduction (p=<0.001). Lung ultrasound-guided dry-weight reduction was achieved in 71.4% of patients compared to 22.2% with standard care (P<0.001), leading to reverse left ventricular and atrial remodeling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: