Key result
Pulsed Doppler detects ~22% more cases of circulating bubbles after decompression than 2D echocardiography.
Why the study?
The utility of pulsed Doppler and 2D echocardiography for detecting and quantifying circulating bubbles after decompression in sport diving was evaluated.
Does pulsed Doppler improve the detection of circulating bubbles compared to 2D echocardiography in sport divers after decompression?
Observational (n=23)
Does pulsed Doppler improve the detection of circulating bubbles compared to 2D echocardiography in sport divers after decompression?
Pulsed Doppler is more sensitive than 2D echocardiography for detecting circulating venous gas emboli after SCUBA diving.
Pulsed Doppler may improve post-decompression bubble detection; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The aim of this study was to determine the utility of pulsed Doppler and 2D echocardiography for the detection and the quantification of circulating bubbles after decompression. Twenty-three sport divers performed 60 SCUBA dives (mean 32 msw). An evaluation of circulating bubbles was performed using 2D images one hour after diving. Circulating bubbles were also detected with pulsed Doppler. The sample volume was placed in the outflow area of the right ventricle 1-2 cm below the pulmonary valve. 2D echocardiography showed circulating bubbles in right cavities of the heart in 32 cases. Short axis parasternal view and right cavities long axis view were the best incidences. Pulsed Doppler confirmed the results in these 32 cases and detected circulating bubbles in seven other cases. Isometric contraction of muscle limb must be performed to increase the sensitivity of detection. The count of the bubbles may be evaluated when using a combination of Spencer's and Powell's grading. We conclude that 2D echocardiography is less accurate than pulsed Doppler in the detection of circulating bubbles after decompression. Further studies are needed to compare pulsed Doppler guided by 2D echocardiography to continuous Doppler for the detection of circulating bubbles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boussuges et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Decompression induced venous gas emboli (n=23). Pulsed Doppler vs. 2D echocardiography was evaluated on Detection of circulating bubbles. Pulsed Doppler detected circulating bubbles in 39 of 60 dives, compared to 32 cases detected by 2D echocardiography, indicating 2D echocardiography is less accurate after decompression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: