Key result
Antecedent hypertension linked to ~408% higher risk of LV remodeling six months post-MI.
Why the study?
Antecedent hypertension adversely affects mortality and heart failure after myocardial infarction, and its relationship to ventricular remodeling after MI needed assessment.
Does antecedent hypertension worsen left ventricular remodeling in patients after a first acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=94)
No
Does antecedent hypertension worsen left ventricular remodeling in patients after a first acute myocardial infarction?
Antecedent hypertension is associated with accelerated left ventricular cavity dilatation and impaired ejection fraction recovery 6 months after a first acute myocardial infarction.
May inform post-MI risk stratification for remodeling; leaves open whether BP control alters trajectories.
Antecedent hypertension adversely affects mortality and heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI). In addition, accelerated ventricular remodeling is a contributor to the increased mortality observed after MI. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of antecedent hypertension to ventricular remodeling after MI. Ninety-four patients presenting with a first acute MI who were treated with reperfusion therapy within 12 h of their symptom onset were enrolled in this study. All of them underwent left ventriculography immediately after reperfusion therapy and again at 6 months after the occurrence of MI. Patients were divided into two groups: a hypertensive group and a normotensive group. End-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), and ejection fraction (EF) values in the acute phase were compared to those at 6 months after acute MI in either group. The hypertensive group showed a significant increase in both EDVI and ESVI after 6 months, whereas the normotensive group did not. In addition, there was no change in EF in the hypertensive group, whereas EF increased significantly after 6 months in the normotensive group. As a result, the percent changes in ESVI and EF were significantly different between the hypertensive group and normotensive group. The results demonstrated that antecedent hypertension interacts with ventricular cavity dilatation after MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshiyama et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=94). Antecedent hypertension vs. Normotension was evaluated on Left ventricular remodeling (increase >15% in LV EDVI or LV ESVI) (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.355-19.07, p=0.0159). Antecedent hypertension was a significant independent predictor of left ventricular remodeling 6 months after a first acute myocardial infarction (OR 5.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: