Key result
b-IPMA achieves ~99% diagnostic agreement with commercial ELISA.
Why the study?
PRV variant strains exhibited amino acid changes in glycoprotein E, necessitating a new assay to counteract the potential impact of epitope variations on serological diagnostics.
The developed b-IPMA is a highly sensitive and specific tool for differentiating between pseudorabies virus-infected and vaccinated swine.
May aid pseudorabies differentiation in swine research; leaves open field validation before diagnostic adoption.
Pseudorabies (PR) outbreaks have devastated many swine farms in several parts of China since late 2011. The outbreak-associated pseudorabies virus (PRV) variant strains exhibited some typical amino acid changes in glycoprotein E (gE), a diagnostic antigen used for discriminating between PRV-infected and vaccinated animals (DIVA). To counteract the potential impact of epitope variations on current serological diagnostics of PRV, we produced monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against gE protein of one representative PRV variant strain and developed a blocking immunoperoxidase monolayer assay (b-IPMA) for DIVA. The b-IPMA was based on the inhibition of binding between PRV-infected cells and mAb by PRV-specific antibodies present in clinical swine sera and was validated by comparison with a commercial PRV gpI Antibody Test Kit (IDEXX Laboratories, USA). The diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity and agreement were determined to be 99.25%, 98.18% and 99.02% respectively upon testing 509 serum samples. b-IPMA detected only PRV-specific antibodies and showed no cross- -reactivity with antibodies elicited by gE-deleted vaccine or other common swine pathogens. Thus, b-IPMA has the potential to be used for high-throughput screening of PRV-infected animals in veterinary clinics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) studied Pseudorabies virus (PRV) infection in swine (n=509). Blocking immunoperoxidase monolayer assay (b-IPMA) vs. Commercial PRV gpI Antibody Test Kit (IDEXX) was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and agreement. The developed blocking immunoperoxidase monolayer assay (b-IPMA) demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 99.25%, specificity of 98.18%, and agreement of 99.02% compared to a commercial ELISA kit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: