Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dealings that the Thai nation state has had with archaeological sites and antiquities appear to fit at least as well within the framework of antiquarian collecting as within that of modern archaeology. It is argued that this reflects the potential that sites and antiquities have to function as cultural capital. Citing Pierre Bourdieu, it is proposed that there is a commonality of interests between the state and the many private collectors among the Thai elite and that this derives partly from the emphasis that is placed on the display or performative potential of sites and antiquities. An appreciation of how antiquities function as cultural capital is surely a prerequisite for any successful effort to counter the looting of sites and the illegal trade in antiquities. ‘There is an economy of cultural goods, but it has a specific logic.’[1]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denis Byrne (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: