Key result
FNA correctly diagnoses pleomorphic liposarcoma in ~50% of cases, limited by absent or unnoticed lipoblasts.
Why the study?
Pleomorphic liposarcoma is the least common and most aggressive liposarcoma form, but few large fine-needle aspiration biopsy studies exist.
What are the cytomorphologic features and diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma?
Observational (n=20)
What are the cytomorphologic features and diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma?
FNA biopsy can successfully identify malignancy in pleomorphic liposarcoma, but specific subtyping is limited by sampling bias and the frequent absence or non-recognition of pleomorphic lipoblasts.
FNA detects malignancy in all PLPS cases but specific diagnosis in only 50%; leaves open refined sampling or ancillary strategies for heterogeneous sarcomas.
BACKGROUND: Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) is the least common but most aggressive of all forms of liposarcoma (LPS). Its diagnosis relies on the recognition of pleomorphic lipoblasts (PLBs), whose numbers vary considerably. Because few large fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy studies exist, the authors review their experience with PLPS. METHODS: The authors' cytopathology files were searched for PLPS with histopathologic verification. FNA biopsy smears were performed via standard techniques. RESULTS: Twenty cases from 20 patients (male/female ratio, 2.3/1; age range, 22-77 years; mean age, 58 years) met the inclusion criteria. All had tissue confirmation. Biopsy sites included the following: thigh (11 [55%]), upper extremity (4 [20%]), axilla (2 [10%]), neck (1 [5%]), chest wall (1 [5%]), and mediastinum (1 [5%]). Aspirates were from primary (17 [85%]), locally recurrent (2 [10%]), and metastatic neoplasms (1 [5%]). The FNA diagnoses were PLPS (10 [50%]), myxofibrosarcoma (4 [20%]), LPS (2 [10%]), sarcoma (2 [10%]), and high-grade malignant neoplasm (2 [10%]). Smears showed thick cell clusters and dissociated single forms. Pleomorphic, epithelioid, and bizarre cell/nuclear shapes were common. PLBs were absent, rare, or unnoticed in 45%. In 25%, smears dominated by myxoid stroma were diagnosed as high-grade myxofibrosarcoma or myxoid LPS. Ancillary testing performed in 5 cases had limited diagnostic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: FNA biopsy of PLPS, although able to successfully recognize malignancy, suffers from a sampling bias due to an inability to capture or recognize PLBs in a significant proportion of cases secondary to the heterogeneous composition of this neoplasm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakely et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Pleomorphic liposarcoma (n=20). Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was evaluated on FNA diagnosis of pleomorphic liposarcoma. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy correctly diagnosed pleomorphic liposarcoma in 50% of cases, with pleomorphic lipoblasts absent, rare, or unnoticed in 45% of smears.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: