Key result
TCD-bubble test detects PFO with ~97% sensitivity in young to middle-aged acute stroke patients.
Why the study?
Current stroke guidelines do not recommend routine screening for PFO in acute ischemic stroke patients of undetermined cause, and the diagnostic accuracy of TCD-bubble testing in younger AIS patients needed evaluation.
Does the transcranial Doppler bubble test accurately detect patent foramen ovale in young to middle-aged patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=383)
No
Does the transcranial Doppler bubble test accurately detect patent foramen ovale in young to middle-aged patients with acute ischemic stroke?
The transcranial Doppler bubble test is a highly sensitive, non-invasive screening tool for patent foramen ovale in younger ischemic stroke patients, where a negative result can reliably preclude further invasive evaluation with TEE.
Supports TCD-bubble testing to exclude PFO noninvasively in younger stroke patients; challenges guidelines and leaves open need for prospective validation.
Background: Current stroke guidelines do not recommend routine screening for a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) of undetermined cause. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the transcranial Doppler bubble test (TCD-bubble) for PFO detection in younger AIS patients. Patients and methods: Data from a prospective institutional stroke registry were retrospectively analyzed, including AIS patients aged ≤65 years treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) over 5 years. Right-to-left shunt (RLS) was assessed using the TCD-bubble test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for PFO detection were calculated using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference. Furthermore, we included a ROC-analysis to provide a bubble-threshold and calculated a new sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. Results: Of 383 patients, 120 (31%) underwent TCD-bubble testing: 61 (50.8%) had no RLS, 20 (16.7%) had RLS only during the Valsalva maneuver, and 39 (32.5%) had RLS at rest. Cardiovascular risk profiles and functional outcomes did not differ between RLS-positive and -negative patients. Among 87 patients with TEE, PFO was confirmed in 69.4% of RLS-positive cases (PPV), while a negative TCD-bubble test excluded PFO in 97.4% (NPV). Sensitivity and specificity were 97.1 and 71.2%, respectively. A cut-off of ≥3 bubbles in TCD-bubble testing resulted in a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 88.5% for PFO detection. Conclusion: The TCD-bubble test is a reliable, non-invasive screening tool for PFO in younger AIS patients with high sensitivity and NPV for PFO detection. A positive result warrants confirmatory TEE, while a negative test may preclude further invasive evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bogdanova et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=383). Transcranial Doppler bubble test (TCD-bubble) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Sensitivity for patent foramen ovale (PFO) detection (95% CI 85.1-99.9). The TCD-bubble test demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for detecting patent foramen ovale in young to middle-aged acute ischemic stroke patients, with a sensitivity of 97.1% and a negative predictive value of 97.4%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: