Key result
DBS electrode impedance declines by ~73 Ω/year and remains lower in active contacts.
Why the study?
Long-term variation in deep brain stimulation electrode impedance and its relationship with contact activity have received little attention.
How does deep brain stimulation electrode impedance vary over time and with contact activity in patients with movement disorders?
Observational (n=84)
How does deep brain stimulation electrode impedance vary over time and with contact activity in patients with movement disorders?
Effect estimate: Decrease of 73 Ω/year
p-value: p=< 0.001
DBS electrode impedance decreases gradually over time in a stimulation-dependent manner, impacting long-term programming and closed-loop device development.
Impedance decline may necessitate DBS programming adjustments; leaves open closed-loop device optimization in movement disorders.
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode impedance is a major determinant of current delivery to target tissues, but long-term variation in impedance has received little attention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between electrode impedance and time in a large DBS patient population and characterize the relationship between contact activity and impedance. METHODS: We collected retrospective impedance and programming data from 128 electrodes in 84 patients with Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or dystonia. Effects of time, contact activity, stimulation voltage and other parameters on impedance were assessed. We also examined impedance changes following contact activation and deactivation. RESULTS: Impedance decreased by 73 Ω/year (p < 0.001), with 72% of contacts following a downward trend. Impedance was on average 163 Ω lower in active contacts (p < 0.001). Contact activation and inactivation were associated with a more (p < 0.001) and less (p = 0.016) rapid decline in impedance, respectively. Higher stimulation voltages were associated with lower impedance values (p < 0.001). Contact number and electrode model were also significant predictors of impedance. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance decreases gradually in a stimulation-dependent manner. These trends have implications for long-term programming, the development of a closed-loop DBS device and current understanding of the electrode-tissue interface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satzer et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or dystonia (n=84). Deep brain stimulation (time and contact activity) vs. Inactive contacts / lower stimulation voltages was evaluated on Change in electrode impedance over time (Decrease of 73 Ω/year, p=< 0.001). Deep brain stimulation electrode impedance decreased gradually over time by 73 Ω/year (p < 0.001), and was on average 163 Ω lower in active contacts compared to inactive ones.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: