Key result
Class I and III antiarrhythmics and nebivolol increase ventricular fibrillation threshold compared to control.
Why the study?
The comparative effects of class I-IV antiarrhythmic agents on ventricular fibrillation threshold in an in vivo model were not well characterized.
Do class I-IV antiarrhythmic agents increase the ventricular fibrillation threshold in anesthetized guinea pigs?
Do class I-IV antiarrhythmic agents increase the ventricular fibrillation threshold in anesthetized guinea pigs?
Class III antiarrhythmic agents, encainide, and nebivolol significantly increased the ventricular fibrillation threshold in a guinea pig model, whereas atenolol, metoprolol, and verapamil did not.
Guinea pig results are hypothesis-generating; leaves open whether these agents raise VF threshold in humans.
We compared the effects of class I-IV antiarrhythmic agents on the ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) induced by electrical stimulation directly on the myocardium in anesthetized, open-chest guinea pigs. VFT was assessed by determining the intensity (mA) of electrical current required to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF) and is expressed as a percentage change of the baseline premedication value. The following antiarrhythmic agents or their solvent were administered intravenously (i.v.) to pentobarbital-anesthetized animals (n = 6-12 per group): class I antiarrhythmic agent encainide (1.5 mg/kg); class II antiarrhythmic agents atenolol (2.5 mg/kg), metoprolol (2.5 mg/kg), and nebivolol (2.5 mg/kg); class III antiarrhythmic agents dofetilide (0.08 mg/kg), terikalant (0.04 mg/kg), and DL-sotalolol (10 mg/kg); and class IV antiarrhythmic agent verapamil (0.16 mg/kg). The antiarrhythmic compounds or their solvents resulted in the following changes in the VFT at 15 min after treatment: saline control, 1 +/- 14% (mean +/- SEM) from its baseline value; 10% hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrine (CD), 4 +/- 13%; encainide, 183 +/- 46% (p < 0.05 vs. saline); atenolol, 66 +/- 23% (p > 0.05 vs. saline); metoprolol, 89 +/- 25% (p > 0.05 vs. saline); nebivolol, 224 +/- 58% (p < 0.05 vs. 10% CD); DL-sotalol, 485 +/- 119% (p < 0.05 vs. saline); dofetilide, 357 +/- 69% (p < 0.05 vs. saline); terikalant, 487 +/- 183% (p < 0.05 vs. saline), and verapamil, -17 +/- 21% (p > 0.05 vs. saline). At the doses used, all compounds significantly reduced heart rate (HR).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (1995) studied Ventricular fibrillation. Class I-IV antiarrhythmic agents vs. Saline or 10% hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrine was evaluated on Percentage change of the baseline premedication value of ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) (p=<0.05). Class I and III antiarrhythmic agents and nebivolol significantly increased the ventricular fibrillation threshold compared to control (p<0.05), whereas atenolol, metoprolol, and verapamil did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: