Key result
Female sex was not associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to male sex in patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI with ultrathin stents (18.6% vs 17.1%; P=0.64).
Why the study?
Data comparing clinical outcomes between women and men undergoing PCI with ultrathin stents on unprotected left main coronary artery were lacking.
Does female sex compared to male sex affect the risk of MACE in patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI with ultrathin stents?
Cohort (n=793)
Does female sex compared to male sex affect the risk of MACE in patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI with ultrathin stents?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI with ultrathin stents, clinical outcomes including MACE and TLR are comparable between women and men.
INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of data on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with ultrathin stents on unprotected left main (ULM) coronary artery comparing women and men. METHODS: All patients treated with ULM-PCI with ultrathin stents (struts ≤81 μm) enrolled in the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study were analyzed according to a sex-assessment evaluation. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization [TLR], and stent thrombosis) was the primary endpoint, whereas single components of MACE were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Out of a cohort of 793 patients, a total of 172 women (21.7%) and 621 men (78.3%) were included. Compared with men, women were older and less frequently smokers, had more frequently a history of previous PCI, and presented more frequently with an acute coronary syndrome. Among women, ostial lesions were more prevalent and mean stent diameter was lower compared with men. After 13.4 months (range, 8.4-21.6 months), 32 women (18.6%) and 106 men (17.1%) experienced MACE (P=.64). Censoring follow-up data at 3 years, no differences were observed in MACE (16.9 vs 14.7 per 100•patient-years; log-rank P=.61) and their single components between women and men. At multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91: 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to -2.95; P<.01) and acute coronary syndrome presentation (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.22-2.77; P=.01) were independent predictors of MACE overall. Larger stent size (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P<.01) and longer dual-antiplatelet therapy duration (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99; P=.03) were associated with a reduced risk of MACE during the subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSION: Ultrathin stents offer low rates of MACE and TLR in the overall population without significant differences between sexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trabattoni et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Unprotected left main coronary artery disease (n=793). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization [TLR], and stent thrombosis) (p=.64). Female sex was not associated with an increased risk of MACE compared to male sex in patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI with ultrathin stents (18.6% vs 17.1%; P=0.64).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: