Key result
Lycopene and CAPE mitigate cisplatin-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis in rat lungs without reducing inflammation.
Why the study?
Cisplatin causes reactive oxygen species increase and lung toxicity, prompting evaluation and comparison of the antioxidant molecules lycopene and caffeic acid phenethyl ester in preventing this damage.
Do lycopene and caffeic acid phenethyl ester prevent cisplatin-induced lung damage in rats?
Do lycopene and caffeic acid phenethyl ester prevent cisplatin-induced lung damage in rats?
Lycopene and CAPE partially protect against cisplatin-induced lung damage in rats by reducing oxidative stress and apoptosis, though they do not fully suppress the inflammatory NO pathway.
May partially mitigate cisplatin lung injury in rats; leaves open clinical translation and full anti-inflammatory efficacy.
INTRODUCTION: Antioxidants such as lycopene (LCP) and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) represent ideal molecules for the treatment of different reactive oxygen species (ROS) associated disorders. Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent, causing an increase in ROS and DNA damage, with numerous side effects, which include lung toxicity. In the presents study, we evaluated and mutually compared the potential of LCP and CAPE in preventing cisplatin-induced rat lung damage. METHODS: The study was done using pathohistological analysis and a panel of biochemical parameters that reflect lung oxidative tissue damage, inflammation, and apoptosis. RESULTS: The obtained results suggest that cisplatin (10 mg/kg) causes significant disturbances in the lung tissue morphology, followed by an increase in lipid peroxidization and protein modification. Also, a pronounced inflammatory response and cell apoptosis cascade activation was noted. Both LCP and CAPE were able to mitigate the changes, to a different extent, in oxidative damage and apoptosis progression induced by cisplatin. However, they both had limited effect on inflammation since they only prevented an increase in myeloperoxidase activity but had not been able to prevent the NO generation. CONCLUSION: It is hard to be exact in saying whether LCP or CAPE is better in preventing cis-platin-induced lung damage since they obviously possess different mechanisms of action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rančić et al. (2021) studied Cisplatin-induced lung damage. Lycopene (LCP) and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) vs. Cisplatin alone was evaluated on Lung oxidative tissue damage, inflammation, and apoptosis. Both lycopene and caffeic acid phenethyl ester mitigated oxidative damage and apoptosis progression induced by cisplatin in rat lung tissue, but had limited effects on inflammation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: