Objective: This study aimed to determine prevalence of inducible and constitutive clindamycin resistance among clinical S. aureus isolates and also study their association with methicillin resistance. Methods: A cross-sectional study including 140 non-duplicate isolates of S. aureus was done. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological methods and methicillin resistance was detected by cefoxitin disc diffusion method. Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by D-test. Results: Prevalence of inducible and constitutive clindamycin resistance was 12.10% and 7.90% respectively. Constitutive and inducible resistance was associated with MRSA. An unusual phenotype, erythromycin sensitive and clindamycin resistance, was detected in 2 MRSA isolates. Conclusions: Inducible and constitutive clindamycin resistance is low in our setting. Constitutive and inducible resistance was associated with MRSA. However the trends in resistance vary in different places. D-test reporting should be done routinely which will allow clinicians to opt for clindamycin judiciously and avoid potential treatment failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sah et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: