Key result
Waist circumference and BMI are linked to ~243% greater odds of adipose tissue insulin resistance.
Why the study?
The study aimed to examine the association between different anatomical forms of obesity and adipose tissue insulin resistance, and assess their diagnostic value and contribution.
Are different anatomical forms of obesity associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance in subjects aged 50 years or over?
Cross-Sectional (n=499)
No
Are different anatomical forms of obesity associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance in subjects aged 50 years or over?
Odds Ratio: 3.43 (95% CI 2.03–5.82)
p-value: p=<0.001
Waist circumference in males and BMI in females are strong indicators of adipose tissue insulin resistance, suggesting sex-specific anthropometric targets for metabolic risk reduction.
Sex-specific anthropometrics may identify adipose tissue insulin resistance; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Aims This study aimed to examine the association of different anatomical forms of obesity with adipose tissue insulin resistance and to assess the diagnostic value and contribution of obesity to adipose tissue insulin resistance. Methods This cross-sectional study included a total of 499 subjects aged 50 years or over. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to clarify the association of different forms of obesity with adipose tissue insulin resistance (calculated as fasting insulin level×fasting free fatty acids level). Receiver operating characteristic cure analyses were used to assess the diagnostic value of each anthropometric indicator for adipose tissue insulin resistance. Attributable risk per cent and population attributable risk per cent were calculated to assess the contribution of obesity to adipose tissue insulin resistance. Results After adjustment for potential confounders, we showed that anthropometric indicators were all positively associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance. In males, waist circumference (WC) was the strongest associated factor (OR, 3.43 (95% CI 2.03 to 5.82)) and indicator (area under the curve (AUC): 0.79) of adipose tissue insulin resistance among those indicators. Here, abdominal obesity (WC≥90 cm) accounted for 64.9% of adipose tissue insulin resistance in the abdominal obese males. Accordingly, body mass index (BMI) was the strongest associated factor (OR,3.08 (95% CI 2.04 to 4.66)) and indicator (AUC: 0.78) of adipose tissue insulin resistance in females. Here, general obesity of BMI≥25 kg/m 2 accounted for 66.2% of the adipose tissue insulin resistance in the general obese females. We further demonstrated that adipose tissue insulin resistance was associated or trended to be associated with the metabolic diseases of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and fatty liver in subjects with normal BMI and WC. Conclusions Maintaining WC in males and BMI in females to a normal range could be an important strategy to significantly reduce the occurrence of adipose tissue insulin resistance and the subsequent metabolic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Adipose tissue insulin resistance (n=499). Obesity (waist circumference and body mass index) vs. Normal anthropometric indicators was evaluated on Adipose tissue insulin resistance (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.03 to 5.82, p=<0.001). Waist circumference in males (OR 3.43) and body mass index in females (OR 3.08) were the strongest anthropometric indicators associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: