Key result
UK region shows no association with incident CVD in older women.
Why the study?
Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in women shows regional variations not explained by common risk factors, and analysis of CVD incidence may reveal further regional divergence with age.
Cohort (n=2,685)
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 0.85 (95% CI 0.64–1.12)
Regional differences in cardiovascular disease incidence among UK women do not further diverge in later life, suggesting geographic targeting of healthcare resources for CVD may not be appropriate for older age groups.
No significant regional divergence in later-life CVD incidence among UK women; leaves open whether geographic targeting remains relevant for older age groups.
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women shows regional variations not explained by common risk factors. Analysis of CVD incidence will provide insight into whether there is further divergence between regions with increasing age. METHODS: Seven-year follow-up data on 2685 women aged 59-80 (mean 69) at baseline from 23 towns in the UK were available from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Time to fatal or non-fatal CVD was analyzed using Cox regression with adjustment for risk factors, using multiple imputation for missing values. RESULTS: Compared to South England, CVD incidence is similar in North England (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.84, 1.31)) and Scotland (0.93 (0.68, 1.27)), but lower in Midlands/Wales (0.85 (0.64, 1.12)). Event severity influenced regional variation, with South England showing lower fatal incident CVD than other regions, but higher non-fatal incident CVD. Kaplan-Meier plots suggested that regional divergence in CVD occurred before baseline (before mean baseline age of 69). CONCLUSIONS: In women, regional differences in CVD early in adult life do not further diverge in later life. This may be due to regional differences in early detection, survivorship of women entering the study, or event severity. Targeting health care resources for CVD by geographic variation may not be appropriate for older age-groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=2,685). Geographical region (Midlands/Wales) vs. South England was evaluated on Time to fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.12). Compared to South England, cardiovascular disease incidence in older women did not significantly diverge by region in later life, with similar rates in North England (HR 1.05) and Scotland (HR 0.93), and slightly lower rates in Midlands/Wales (HR 0.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: