Key result
Structured teaching improves nurses' knowledge of deep breathing and incentive spirometry, reaching ~68% proficiency.
Why the study?
Does a structured teaching programme improve knowledge regarding deep breathing exercise with incentive spirometry among staff nurses?
Does a structured teaching programme improve knowledge regarding deep breathing exercise with incentive spirometry among staff nurses?
Absolute Event Rate: 68% vs 8%
Staff nurses had average to poor baseline knowledge regarding deep breathing exercises with incentive spirometry for post-cardiothoracic surgery patients.
Average staff nurse knowledge warrants targeted education; leaves open effects on care quality or outcomes.
Introduction:The chapter has deals with the statement of the problem, objectives of the study, operational d methodology and different steps which were undertaken for gathering and organization of data for the investigation. Materials & Methods:It includes research design, setting, sample and sampling technique, development and description of the instruments, pilot study and procedure for data collection and plan for data analysis.Results: Findings revealed that staff Nurse average knowledge regarding deep breathing exercise with incentive spirometery on respiratory status of the patient who have undergone cardiothoracic surgery.Conclusions: The pre-test knowledge score among staff nurses were average and poor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atika Sharma (2023) studied Knowledge regarding deep breathing exercise with incentive spirometry (n=60). Structured Teaching Programme vs. Pre-test (baseline) was evaluated on Proportion of nurses with good knowledge score (76-100%). A structured teaching programme improved staff nurses' knowledge regarding deep breathing exercises and incentive spirometry, increasing the proportion with good knowledge from 8% to 68%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: