Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
If a test is intended to impact teaching and leaning, how can we make a case for its validity? Currently, it is argued, the case for the validity of a test considers only the test maker's view of what the scores mean and whether they are useful for teachers and learners. Although the test maker's perspective is a necessary one, it is insufficient to validate a test, so an expanded framework for validating tests is needed. The expansion proposes using teachers'/professionals' and students' perspectives as necessary information in the validation of what test scores mean and whether they are useful to teachers and learners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carol Kehr Tittle (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: