Key result
Hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation creates larger ablation zones than microwave ablation beyond 30 minutes.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the sizes and shapes of ablation zones resulting from HRFA versus MWA, using NSRFA as a control, across matched power settings and ablation durations.
Does hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation create larger ablation zones compared to microwave ablation in an ex vivo liver model?
Does hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation create larger ablation zones compared to microwave ablation in an ex vivo liver model?
In an ex vivo liver model, hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation creates larger ablation zones than microwave ablation when applied for more than 30 minutes.
HRFA produces larger ablation zones than MWA beyond 30 min in ex vivo models; leaves open clinical relevance and safety.
Objectives To compare sizes and shapes of ablation zones resulting from hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation (HRFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), using normal saline infusion radiofrequency ablation (NSRFA) as a control, at a variety of matched power settings and ablation durations, in an ex vivo bovine liver model.Methods A total of 90 ablation procedures were performed, using each of three modalities: NSRFA, HRFA, and MWA. For each modality, five ablation procedures were performed for each combination of power (80 W, 100 W, or 120 W) and duration (5, 10, 20, 30, 45, or 60 min). The size of ablation zones were compared using ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, or generalized linear regression.Results For ablation durations up to 30 min, mean transverse diameter (TD) after HRFA and MWA did not differ significantly (β = 0.13, p = .20). For ablation durations greater than 30 min, mean TD was significantly larger after HRFA than after MWA (β = 1.657, p < .001). The largest TD (9.46 cm) resulted from HRFA performed with 100 W power for 60 min.Conclusions Compared to MWA, monopolar HRFA with power settings of 80 W–120 W and durations of less than 30 min showed no significant difference. When duration of more than 30 min, HRFA created larger ablation zones than MWA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2020) studied Ex vivo bovine liver model (n=90). Hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation (HRFA) vs. Microwave ablation (MWA) and normal saline infusion radiofrequency ablation (NSRFA) was evaluated on Mean transverse diameter of ablation zones (β = 1.657, p=<.001). Hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation created significantly larger ablation zones than microwave ablation for durations greater than 30 minutes (β = 1.657, p < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: