Key result
SP-EPP robotic prostatectomy is linked to ~397% higher odds of never receiving opioids vs MP-RALP.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate perioperative factors associated with opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy in a single institution.
Does the DaVinci SP® robotic platform with an extraperitoneal approach improve opioid-free management in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy?
Observational (n=210)
No
Does the DaVinci SP® robotic platform with an extraperitoneal approach improve opioid-free management in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy?
Odds Ratio: 4.97 (95% CI 1.81–14.77)
p-value: p=0.002
The use of a less invasive extraperitoneal robotic approach (SP-EPP) for radical prostatectomy is associated with higher odds of opioid-free management compared to standard multi-port transperitoneal approach.
May support SP-EPP for opioid-free prostatectomy; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative factors associated with opioid-free management after robotic radical prostatectomy in a single institution.METHODS: From January 2019 to January 2020, data from patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy was retrospectively entered in a preapproved IRB database. Data were analyzed according to the postoperative opioid administration in hospital and/or after discharge. Robotic radical prostatectomy was performed using either the standard multi-port Da Vinci Si robotic platform with a transperitoneal approach (MP-RALP) or the novel DaVinci SP® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with an extraperitoneal approach (SP-EPP). Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery were included in the “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) protocol regardless of the surgery approach.RESULTS: During the study period, 210 patients matched the selection criteria. Of those, 158(75%) patients received opioids during the hospital stay or after discharge and 52(25%) patients never received opioids. SP-EPP surgical approach and shorter LOS were predictors of never receiving opioids (Odds Ratio [OR]=4.97, (95% CI 1.81-14.77, P=0.002 and OR=0.56, CI 95% 0.35-0.86, P=0.011, respectively). SP-EPP surgical approach was increasing the odds of remaining opioid free whether in-hospital or after discharge (OR= 11.97, 95% CI 4.8-32, P<0.0001 and OR=11.6, 95% CI 4.6-31, P<0.0001, respectively). Finally, a high BMI increased the odds of receiving opioid in hospital or after discharge (OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, P=0.003 and OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, P=0.002, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: In this series, after robotic radical prostatectomy the use of a less invasive approach (SP-EPP), a shorter LOS and a lower BMI, were predictive of opioid-free status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawczyn et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Robotic radical prostatectomy (n=210). DaVinci SP robotic platform with an extraperitoneal approach (SP-EPP) vs. Standard multi-port Da Vinci Si robotic platform with a transperitoneal approach (MP-RALP) was evaluated on Never receiving opioids (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.81-14.77, p=0.002). The SP-EPP surgical approach for robotic radical prostatectomy significantly increased the odds of never receiving opioids (OR 4.97; 95% CI 1.81-14.77; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: