Key result
Inverted periorbital flow with abnormal CBF reactivity identifies patients with lower cerebral perfusion pressures.
Why the study?
Assessment of haemodynamic significance of internal carotid artery stenosis requires indirect physiologic testing of collateral circulation beyond angiography or direct ultrasound examination.
Does periorbital Doppler examination combined with CBF measurement accurately assess cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with carotid artery disease?
Observational (n=35)
Does periorbital Doppler examination combined with CBF measurement accurately assess cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with carotid artery disease?
Periorbital Doppler examination combined with CBF measurement can identify patients with severe reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure prior to carotid endarterectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May identify low cerebral perfusion pressure noninvasively in carotid disease; leaves open validation before guiding endarterectomy decisions.
To assess the haemodynamic significance of an internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, angiography or direct ultrasound examination should be supplemented by indirect physiologic testing of the collateral circulation. Among the tests proposed, we used the periorbital flow direction, assessed by Doppler technique, and cerebral blood flow reactivity to vasodilation, by i.v. xenon-133 technique, in 35 patients before carotid endarterectomy. The results were related to the actual perfusion pressures, measured during surgery in the distal ICA. All 15 patients with normal orthograde periorbital flow had normal cerebral blood flow (CBF) vasoreactivity and no, or only minor, reduction in ICA perfusion pressure. Of the 20 patients with inverted flow, 12 had normal and 8 had abnormal CBF reactivity. These 8 patients proved to have significantly lower cerebral perfusion pressures, as compared with the remaining 12 patients with inverted periorbital flow (p less than 0.001), who in turn had lower perfusion pressures than the 15 patients with orthograde flow (p less than 0.005). Based on these results, we suggest periorbital Doppler examination as a haemodynamic adjunct to direct ICA visualization. A normal orthograde flow will most certainly rule out any severe pressure reduction. By measuring CBF at rest and following vasodilation in cases with inverted flow, most patients with severe reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure may be identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sillesen et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Internal carotid artery stenosis (n=35). Periorbital Doppler examination and cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurement vs. Orthograde periorbital flow / normal CBF reactivity was evaluated on Cerebral perfusion pressure measured during surgery in the distal ICA (p=<0.001). Inverted periorbital flow with abnormal cerebral blood flow reactivity identified patients with lower cerebral perfusion pressures compared to those with normal reactivity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: