Key result
Rare CALR3 variants show no link to cardiomyopathy after excluding a Dutch founder variant.
Why the study?
The pathogenicity of CALR3 variants in monogenic cardiomyopathy is questionable despite its inclusion in gene panels based on limited evidence.
Are rare variants in the CALR3 gene a monogenic cause of cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=6,154)
Yes
Are rare variants in the CALR3 gene a monogenic cause of cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.78% vs 0.49%
p-value: p=0.0036 (0.89 after removing founder variant)
CALR3 variants are highly unlikely to be a monogenic cause of cardiomyopathy, suggesting the gene should not be included in routine cardiomyopathy genetic testing panels.
Does not support CALR3 as monogenic cardiomyopathy cause; leaves open need for validation before excluding from panels.
The pathogenicity of previously published disease-associated genes and variants is sometimes questionable. Large-scale, population-based sequencing studies have uncovered numerous false assignments of pathogenicity. Misinterpretation of sequence variants may have serious implications for the patients and families involved, as genetic test results are increasingly being used in medical decision making. In this study, we assessed the role of the calreticulin-3 gene (CALR3) in cardiomyopathy. CALR3 has been included in several cardiomyopathy gene panels worldwide. Its inclusion is based on a single publication describing two missense variants in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In our national cardiomyopathy cohort (n = 6154), we identified 17 unique, rare heterozygous CALR3 variants in 48 probands. Overall, our patient cohort contained a significantly higher number of rare CALR3 variants compared to the ExAC population (p = 0.0036). However, after removing a potential Dutch founder variant, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.89). In nine probands, the CALR3 variant was accompanied by a disease-causing variant in another, well-known cardiomyopathy gene. In three families, the CALR3 variant did not segregate with the disease. Furthermore, we could not demonstrate calreticulin-3 protein expression in myocardial tissues at various ages. On the basis of these findings, it seems highly questionable that variants in CALR3 are a monogenic cause of cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verhagen et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiomyopathy (HCM, DCM, ARVC, LVNC) (n=6,154). Rare heterozygous CALR3 variants vs. ExAC population (healthy controls) was evaluated on Frequency of rare CALR3 variants with potential functional impact (p=0.0036 (0.89 after removing founder variant)). After removing a potential Dutch founder variant, there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of rare CALR3 variants between cardiomyopathy patients and controls (p = 0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: