Key result
A gradient boosting model predicts diuretic resistance in decompensated HF with ~0.95 AUC.
Why the study?
This study performed a prediction and risk factor analysis of diuretic resistance in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure.
Can machine learning models accurately predict diuretic resistance in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure?
Observational (n=18,827)
No
Can machine learning models accurately predict diuretic resistance in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.9512
A machine learning model based on a gradient boosting decision tree can accurately predict diuretic resistance in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure using routine clinical indicators.
May aid risk stratification in decompensated HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Objectives: This study performed a prediction and risk factor analysis of diuretic resistance (DR) in patients with decompensated heart failure during hospitalization. Methods: The data of patients with decompensated heart failure treated in 2010–2018 with DR (n = 3,383) or without DR (n = 15,444) were retrospectively collected from Chinese PLA General Hospital medical records. Statistical analysis of baseline was performed on two groups of people, and the risk factor of DR was analyzed through logic regression. Six machine learning models were built accordingly, and the adjustment of model super parameters was performed by using Bayesian optimization method. Finally, the optimal algorithm was selected according to prediction efficiency. Results: The preliminary analysis of variance showed significant differences in the incidence of DR among patients with lung infection, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, and kidney disease. There were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P < 0.001). In addition, some physical indicators like BMI were different, the laboratory results like mean red blood cell volume or C-reactive protein assay were also significantly different. The optimal classification model indicated that the best cutoff points for risk factors were vein carbon dioxide, 21 mmol/L and 29 mmol/L; total protein, 64 g/L; pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), 7,600 pg/mL; eGFR, 50 mL/(min ∙ 1.73 m2); serum albumin, 33 g/L; hematocrit, 0.32% and 0.56%; red blood cell volume distribution width, 13; and age, 59 years. The optimal area under the curve was 0.9512. The ranked features derived from the model were age, abnormal sodium level, pro-BNP level, serum albumin level,D-dimer level, direct bilirubin level, and eGFR. Conclusions: The DR risk prediction model based on a gradient boosting decision tree created here identified its important risk factors. The model made very accurate predictions using simple indicators and simultaneously calculated cutoff values to help doctors predict the occurrence of DR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Decompensated heart failure (n=18,827). Risk factors for diuretic resistance vs. Patients without diuretic resistance was evaluated on Prediction of diuretic resistance (AUC 0.9512). A gradient boosting decision tree model accurately predicted diuretic resistance in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure, achieving an optimal area under the curve of 0.9512.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: