Key result
The selection of comatose patients for coronary angiography after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains controversial, with 30 to 50% of patients dying before hospital discharge.
Why the study?
Does coronary angiography improve outcomes in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Does coronary angiography improve outcomes in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
This editorial discusses the controversial selection and timing of coronary angiography in comatose patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
The treatment of patients who are comatose after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest involves a complex, multidisciplinary approach that includes the use of targeted temperature management, aggressive hemodynamic management, electroencephalographic monitoring, and consideration of coronary angiography.1 However, studies suggest that despite these interventions, 30 to 50% of these patients die before hospital discharge, and a substantial percentage of long-term survivors have neurologic and cardiac sequelae.2,3 Although clinically significant coronary disease is common in patients who have cardiac arrest,4 the selection of patients for coronary angiography remains controversial. The general consensus is that comatose patients who have had cardiac arrest with evidence of . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abella et al. (2019) conducted an editorial in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Coronary angiography was evaluated. The selection of comatose patients for coronary angiography after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains controversial, with 30 to 50% of patients dying before hospital discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: