Key result
Virtual decentralized anticoagulation clinics maintain ~80% time in therapeutic range.
Why the study?
The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of decentralizing and virtualizing anticoagulation clinics just before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Does decentralization and virtualization of anticoagulation clinics maintain time in therapeutic range in patients requiring INR monitoring?
Cohort (n=5,616)
Yes
Does decentralization and virtualization of anticoagulation clinics maintain time in therapeutic range in patients requiring INR monitoring?
Decentralization and virtualization of INR clinics using point-of-care testing and messaging apps can achieve high time in therapeutic range and patient satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of the decentralization and virtualization of anticoagulation clinics just before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study investigation at Prince Sultan Cardiac Clinics PSCC Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. To evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual coagulation clinic, we calculated the time in therapeutic range (TTR), Morisky score for adherence, and satisfaction. Demographics of the patients were analyzed to group patients based on their regions or districts to facilitate the visits. Thirteen different PHCs/Hospitals were allocated for decentralization based on patient density in that region. Intensive courses were provided for all general practitioners (GPs) regarding warfarin anticoagulation and point of care testing (POCT) using iSTAT. All appointments were scheduled by WhatsApp, with no more actual visits to the main center. RESULTS: Among the included participants (n = 5616), 61.1% were females, 38.9% were males, and the mean age was 60.5 (18-85) years. The total number of clinic visits was 7303 per month, with an average of 1.3 visits per patient. Approximately 95% of the participants had a valvular indication to receive anticoagulation; of them, 55% underwent mitral valve replacement. Moreover, after the virtualization of the INR clinic, keeping INR levels within a therapeutic range was reported in 80% of patients. Regarding patient satisfaction, 90% of the total population was satisfied by the new experience. CONCLUSION: Decentralization and virtualization of the INR clinic have similar TTR results if conducted properly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almesned et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Anticoagulation (n=5,616). Decentralization and virtualization of INR-based anticoagulation clinics was evaluated on Time in therapeutic range (TTR). Decentralization and virtualization of INR-based anticoagulation clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic maintained INR levels within a therapeutic range for 80% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: