Key result
Oral epirubicin nanoparticles reduce tumor size ~40% in mice vs free epirubicin while improving safety.
Why the study?
Epirubicin has poor oral bioavailability and intravenous administration causes rapid plasma concentration changes requiring frequent dosing with serious side effects.
Does oral administration of epirubicin-loaded nanoparticles improve efficacy and safety compared to free epirubicin solution in animal models?
Does oral administration of epirubicin-loaded nanoparticles improve efficacy and safety compared to free epirubicin solution in animal models?
Oral epirubicin-loaded nanoparticles demonstrated improved anti-tumor efficacy and reduced cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity compared to intravenous free epirubicin in animal models.
Oral epirubicin nanoparticles feasible in animals; leaves open translation to human trials for home chemotherapy.
Epirubicin (EPI) elicits poor-oral bioavailability hence commercially available as injection for intravenous administration which follows a rapid increase and fast decay in plasma drug concentration often needs a frequent dosing that may lead to serious side effects. Aim of the present study is to develop a nanoparticulate system which could deliver epirubicin effectively via oral administration and could eventually promote new concept "chemotherapy at home." In this perspective, epirubicin loaded Poly-lactide-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles (EPI-NPs) were developed by double emulsion evaporation techniques and evaluated for its safety and efficacy against Ehrlich's Ascites (EAT) induced tumor in balb/c mice. In vivo fate of nanoparticles after oral administration in Albino wistar rats was also studied. EPI-NPs showed marked reduction in tumor size ∼40% while tumor size was increased 3.55 and 3.28 folds in control as well as in group treated orally with free epirubicin solution (EPI-S), respectively. Furthermore, toxicological evaluation demonstrated insignificant difference in levels of biomarkers including MDA, CAT, SOD, LDH, CK-MB, AST and ALT when EPI-NPs-oral treatment was compared with control group while levels of these biomarkers were found extremely significant in group treated with EPI-S (i.v). and demonstrated increment in LDH (p < 0.001), CK-MB (p < 0.001), AST (p < 0.001), ALT (p < 0.001) and MDA levels (p < 0.001) and reduction in SOD (p < 0.001) and CAT levels (p < 0.001) thus confirmed better safety profile of EPI-NPs oral than EPI-S i.v. Biodistribution study demonstrated the presence of NPs in different body organs and blood which suggests probability of NPs translocation across intestine thus at the tumor site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tariq et al. (2016) studied Ehrlich's Ascites (EAT) induced tumor. Epirubicin loaded Poly-lactide-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles (EPI-NPs) vs. Free epirubicin solution (EPI-S) and control was evaluated on Tumor size. Oral administration of epirubicin-loaded nanoparticles reduced tumor size by ~40% in mice, compared to a >3-fold increase with free epirubicin, and demonstrated a significantly better safety profile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: