Key result
IIb/IIIa inhibitors during SVG stenting increase MACE with GuardWire while showing no benefit with FilterWire.
Why the study?
Although embolic protection devices reduce complications during saphenous vein graft stenting, adverse events still occur in approximately 10% of patients and the efficacy of IIb/IIIa antagonists during SVG intervention is unproven.
Does adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition improve 30-day MACE in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting with embolic protection devices?
Population
651 patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting
Comparison
IIb/IIIa inhibitor use vs no IIb/IIIa inhibitor use with FilterWire EX or GuardWire embolic protection devices
Design
Prospective multicentre randomized trial stratified by intended IIb/IIIa inhibitor use
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
Device-specific effects caution against routine IIb/IIIa use with GuardWire in SVG stenting; extends evidence for tailored embolic protection strategies.
RCT (n=651)
Stratified by intended use of IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Yes
Does adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition improve 30-day MACE in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting with embolic protection devices?
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 8%
p-value: p=0.03
Adjunctive use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may improve procedural outcomes and reduce 30-day MACE during saphenous vein graft stenting when used specifically with filter-based embolic protection devices.
Jonas et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting (n=651). IIb/IIIa inhibitors (in conjunction with FilterWire EX or GuardWire) vs. No IIb/IIIa inhibitors was evaluated on 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (p=0.03). Adjunctive IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during SVG stenting had a significant interaction with device type, yielding similar 30-day MACE with FilterWire (9.9% vs 9.5%) but higher MACE with GuardWire.