Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Longitudinal studies using real-world data are needed to assess the effectiveness of long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE) during successive years of treatment. Objective: This United States-based retrospective analysis assessed the longitudinal effectiveness of lanadelumab LTP on attack rate reduction year on year in lanadelumab-treated patients with HAE. Methods: Data were from the Consortium of Independent Immunology Clinic's HAE Patient Registry, a dataset managed by Trio Health. Patients who were treated with lanadelumab between August 2018 and December 2023 and who remained on treatment for at least 6 months were included. Data were collected during routine clinic visits, with the time between clinic visits defined as "follow-up intervals" for outcome assessment. Given data were ascertained from real-world clinical practices, visits did not occur at uniform fixed intervals. Patients were followed for up to 4 visits after lanadelumab initiation. Results: = .399 vs interval 1). The percentage of attack-free patients increased from 40% during interval 1 to 53% during interval 4. Conclusions: Patients on lanadelumab for at least 6 months had low discontinuation rates. Attack rates were low, and the proportion of attack-free patients increased across intervals, indicating attack-free status was achievable in the later years on treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Connor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: