Key result
Thrombosis and Haemostasis editorial celebrates 10 years of dual Editors-in-Chief and reviews journal impact metrics.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
May inform future thrombosis research directions; leaves open clinical relevance pending higher-level validation.
We are very happy to start 2020 with our traditional January Editorial and Editor's Choice,[ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] especially as this year commemorates a special date for us. Ten years ago, Thrombosis and Haemostasis endowed itself for the first time with two Editors-in-Chief, one each for Basic and Clinical Science. We are very grateful for this fruitful collaboration and these past 10 years working with you, our authors, readers and reviewers. Christian Weber and Gregory Y. H. Lip at a conference in Basel, 2017. In 2019, we could once more count on around 900 submissions from you, a number that has remained stable and portrays the confidence you have in Thrombosis and Haemostasis . Our Impact factor and CiteScore have maintained a stable trend in comparison to others in the field, specifically reflected by the CiteScore Percentile in the category hematology, which matched near 90th, over the past 5 years. We continue to serve as a link journal for the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Thrombosis and on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, as well as being the official journal of the Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH), the Spanish (SETH) society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Australian Vascular Biology Society (AVBS).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lip et al. (2020) reported an editorial. This editorial celebrates the 10-year anniversary of Thrombosis and Haemostasis having two Editors-in-Chief and reviews the journal's submission and impact metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: