Key result
New 9-variable clinical score achieves 100% sensitivity for PE in D-dimer-positive inpatients.
Why the study?
A positive D-dimer test has poor specificity for pulmonary embolism, making it difficult for clinicians to determine which patients need computed tomographic pulmonary angiography.
Does a new clinical decision-making score accurately predict the probability of pulmonary embolism and reduce unnecessary computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in inpatients with a positive D-dimer test?
Observational (n=3,014)
Yes
Does a new clinical decision-making score accurately predict the probability of pulmonary embolism and reduce unnecessary computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in inpatients with a positive D-dimer test?
A new 9-variable clinical decision rule can accurately identify pulmonary embolism in inpatients with positive D-dimer tests, potentially reducing unnecessary CTPA imaging.
May reduce unnecessary CTPA in inpatients; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: A positive D-dimer test has high sensitivity but relatively poor specificity for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, causing difficulty for clinicians unskilled in pulmonary embolism diagnosis in determining whether a patient with a positive D-dimer test needs to undergo computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop a new clinical decision-making rule based on a positive D-dimer result to predict the probability of pulmonary embolism and to guide clinicians in making decisions regarding the need for computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study in three hospitals in China. A total of 3014 inpatients with positive D-dimer results were included. In the derivation group, we built a multivariate logistic regression model and deduced a regression equation from which our score was derived. Finally, we validated the score in an independent cohort. RESULTS: Our score included nine variables (points): chest pain (1.4), chest tightness (2.3), shortness of breath (3.6), hemoptysis (3.4), heart rate ≥100 beats/min (3.6), blood gas analysis (2.9), electrocardiogram presenting a typical S1Q3T3 pattern (4.1), electrocardiogram findings (2.4), and ultrasonic cardiogram findings (3.7). The sensitivities and specificities were 100% and 86.94%, respectively, in the derivation group and 100% and 90.82%, respectively, in the validation group. Additionally, the observed and predicted proportions of patients who underwent computed tomographic pulmonary angiography were 16.82% and 10.76%, respectively, in the derivation group and 18.72% and 11.40%, respectively, in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS: The new score can categorize inpatients with a positive D-dimer test as pulmonary embolism-likely or pulmonary embolism-unlikely, thus reducing unnecessary computed tomographic pulmonary angiography examinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Suspected pulmonary embolism with positive D-dimer (n=3,014). New clinical decision-making rule was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for pulmonary embolism. A new 9-variable clinical decision-making rule for inpatients with a positive D-dimer test demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 90.82% specificity for pulmonary embolism in the validation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: