Key result
Adjusted self-controlled case series optimally identifies drugs linked to upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Why the study?
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a severe, frequent drug-related event, and calibrated case-based designs were needed to enable efficient drug safety alert generation in the French National Healthcare System database.
Observational
Effect estimate: AUC 0.84
Self-controlled case series adjusting for multiple drugs and using a 30-day risk window is an effective method for generating drug safety alerts for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in large healthcare databases.
May aid real-world detection of drug-related upper GI bleeding; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a severe and frequent drug-related event. In order to enable efficient drug safety alert generation in the French National Healthcare System database (SNDS), we assessed and calibrated empirically case-based designs to identify drug associated with UGIB risk. METHODS: population sample using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and mean square error (MSE). Parameters that had major impacts on results were identified through logistic regression. Optimal designs were replicated in the unsampled population. RESULTS: Using a specific UGIB definition, AUCs ranged from 0.64 to 0.80, 0.44 to 0.61 and 0.50 to 0.67, for SCCS, CC and CP, respectively. MSE ranged from 0.07 to 0.39, 0.83 to 1.33 and 1.96 to 4.6, respectively. Univariate regressions showed that high AUCs were achieved with SCCS with multiple drug adjustment and a 30-day risk window starting at exposure. The top-performing SCCS variant in the unsampled population yielded an AUC = 0.84 and MSE = 0.14, with 10/36 negative controls presenting significant estimates. CONCLUSIONS: SCCS adjusting for multiple drugs and using a 30-day risk window has the potential to generate UGIB-related alerts in the SNDS and hypotheses on its potential population impact. Negative control implementation highlighted that low systematic error was generated but that protopathic bias and confounding by indication remained unaddressed issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thurin et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Self-controlled case series (SCCS) with multiple drug adjustment vs. Case-crossover (CC) and case-time-control (CP) designs was evaluated on Identification of drugs associated with UGIB risk measured by area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and mean square error (MSE) (AUC 0.84). Self-controlled case series adjusting for multiple drugs and using a 30-day risk window optimally identified drugs associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUC = 0.84, MSE = 0.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: