Key result
Physically active young females show ~35% greater popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation than males.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether sex differences in baseline diameter influence popliteal flow-mediated dilation, which may be impacted by cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity levels.
Are there sex differences in brachial and popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation among physically active young adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=26)
No
Are there sex differences in brachial and popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation among physically active young adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.2% vs 4.6%
p-value: p=0.001
Physically active young females exhibit greater popliteal, but not brachial, endothelial function compared to males, independent of baseline diameter and light physical activity levels.
May suggest limb-specific endothelial sex differences in active youth; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
When controlling for baseline diameter, males have greater brachial flow-mediated dilation (BA-FMD) responses than females. It is unclear whether sex differences in baseline diameter also influences popliteal FMD (POP-FMD), which may be impacted by cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity levels. We hypothesized that males would exhibit greater BA-FMD and POP-FMD when allometrically scaled to baseline diameter. FMD (ultrasonography), cardiorespiratory fitness (indirect calorimetry), and objectively measured physical activity were assessed in males (n = 13; age, 23 ± 3 years; peak oxygen consumption, 48.0 ± 7.1 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ) and females (n = 13; age, 24 ± 2 years; peak oxygen consumption, 36.8 ± 6.0 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ). Both groups had similarly high levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (503 ± 174 vs. 430 ± 142 min·week −1 , p = 0.25). However, males were more aerobically fit (p < 0.001) and females accumulated more light-intensity physical activity (182 ± 67 vs. 127 ± 53 min·week −1 , p = 0.03). Relative and allometrically scaled BA-FMD were similar (both, p ≥ 0.09) between sexes. In contrast, relative (6.2% ± 1.0% vs. 4.6% ± 1.4%, p = 0.001) and scaled (6.8% ± 1.7% vs. 4.7% ± 1.7%, p = 0.03) POP-FMD were greater in females. Relative POP-FMD was related to light-intensity physical activity in the pooled sample (r = 0.43; p = 0.04). However, the enhanced relative POP-FMD in females remained after adjusting for higher light-intensity physical activity levels (p = 0.01). Young females have enhanced popliteal, but not brachial, endothelial health than males with similar moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity levels and higher cardiorespiratory fitness. Novelty In physically active adults, females had greater POP-FMD but not BA-FMD than males. The enhanced POP-FMD in females was not related to greater vascular smooth muscle sensitivity to nitric oxide or their smaller baseline diameters. POP-FMD was associated with light physical activity levels in the pooled sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johns et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=26). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Relative popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation (POP-FMD) (p=0.001). Physically active young females demonstrated significantly greater relative (6.2% vs. 4.6%) and allometrically-scaled popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation compared to males.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: