Key result
Adding rib mobilization decreases R-R interval, while diaphragm release alone cuts COPD heart rate ~5 bpm.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the feasibility of testing an intervention protocol and measuring the immediate effects of rib mobilization and diaphragm release techniques on cardiac autonomic control in COPD patients.
Does the addition of rib mobilization technique to diaphragm release technique improve cardiac autonomic control in patients with COPD?
RCT (n=14)
randomized
Does the addition of rib mobilization technique to diaphragm release technique improve cardiac autonomic control in patients with COPD?
A pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating manual therapy interventions on cardiac autonomic control in COPD patients, with preliminary data suggesting diaphragm release technique may acutely reduce resting heart rate and increase heart-rate variability.
Diaphragm release may acutely lower heart rate in COPD; leaves open whether adding rib mobilization improves autonomic control.
The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of testing an intervention protocol and measuring the immediate effects of a rib mobilization technique (RMT) and a diaphragm release technique (DRT) on the autonomic nervous system of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This was a pilot study of a randomized controlled trial. Fourteen individuals were evaluated. Eligibility criteria were being a sedentary person with a diagnosis of COPD, age between 50 and 72 years, and being clinically stable. Exclusion criteria were heart disease, other respiratory comorbidities, and body mass index above 30kg/m2. Participants first underwent cardiorespiratory evaluation and were then allocated into 2 groups: the RMT + DRT group and the DRT group. Clinical assessments were performed immediately before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis was carried out through a paired-sample Wilcoxon test, and the comparison between groups was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. All randomized participants completed the assessment and intervention protocol. Sample size was estimated at 24 individuals per group. The DRT group decreased resting heart rate by 5 bpm (P = .03) and increased variance (P = .04) and mean R-R interval (P = .03). The RMT + DRT group decreased mean R-R interval (P = .02). The design for this study appears to be feasible for evaluating manual-therapy intervention in the nonmusculoskeletal function of patients with COPD. It was possible to determine the sample size for future studies. Preliminary data show that the diaphragm release technique may reduce mean resting heart rate and increase heart-rate variability immediately after the intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocha et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=14). Rib mobilization technique (RMT) + diaphragm release technique (DRT) vs. Diaphragm release technique (DRT) was evaluated on Resting heart rate and heart-rate variability (mean R-R interval). Adding rib mobilization to diaphragm release technique decreased mean R-R interval (P=0.02), whereas diaphragm release alone reduced resting heart rate by 5 bpm (P=0.03) in patients with COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: