Key result
Bachmann's bundle, septal, and distal coronary sinus pacing yields 0% AF induction vs RAA pacing.
Why the study?
The relative efficacy and electrophysiological mechanisms of different atrial pacing modes in preventing atrial fibrillation are not clear.
Do different atrial pacing modes prevent the initiation of atrial fibrillation compared to right atrial appendage pacing in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Population
15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, mean age 54 +/- 14 years
Comparison
Bachmann's bundle, right posterior interatrial septum, distal coronary sinus, DSA, and BiA pacing versus right atrial appendage pacing
Design
Electrophysiological study in patients with paroxysmal AF
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change pacing practice; hypothesis-generating for AF prevention and requires randomized confirmation.
Do different atrial pacing modes prevent the initiation of atrial fibrillation compared to right atrial appendage pacing in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 100%
Single-site pacing at Bachmann's bundle, right posterior interatrial septum, or distal coronary sinus is more effective than dual-site or biatrial pacing in preventing AF induction in patients with paroxysmal AF.
YU et al. (2000) studied Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=15). Bachmann's bundle (BB), right posterior interatrial septum (RPS), and distal coronary sinus (DCS) pacing vs. Right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing was evaluated on Induction of atrial fibrillation with early RAA extrastimulation. Bachmann's bundle, right posterior interatrial septum, and distal coronary sinus pacing completely prevented AF induction (0%) compared to right atrial appendage pacing (100%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: