Key result
PRC score outperforms DASH score in predicting CTED after acute PE.
Why the study?
Occurrence of chronic thromboembolic disease after 3 or 6 months of standard anticoagulation in acute pulmonary embolism patients is not uncommon, and no prediction scoring model existed.
Does the PRC score accurately predict the occurrence of chronic thromboembolic disease after acute pulmonary embolism compared to the DASH score?
Cohort (n=1,335)
Does the PRC score accurately predict the occurrence of chronic thromboembolic disease after acute pulmonary embolism compared to the DASH score?
The newly developed PRC score accurately predicts the likelihood of chronic thromboembolic disease occurrence after acute pulmonary embolism, outperforming the existing DASH score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PRC score may aid post-PE CTED risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Occurrence of chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) after 3 or 6 months of standard and effective anticoagulation is not uncommon in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). To date, there has been no scoring model for the prediction of CTED occurrence. METHODS: A Prediction Rule for CTED (PRC) was established in the establishment cohort (n=1,124) and then validated in the validation cohort (n=211). Both original and simplified versions of the PRC score were provided by using different scoring and cut-offs. RESULTS: (2.186; 1.573-2.799; p=0.001), chronic immobility (2.135; 1.741-2.529; p=0.001), D-dimer >2,000 ng/mL (1.618; 1.274-1.962; p=0.005), PE with deep vein thrombosis (3.199; 2.356-4.042; p<0.001), previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) history (5.268; 3.472-7.064; p<0.001), thromboembolism besides VTE (4.954; 3.150-6.758; p<0.001), thrombophilia (3.438; 2.573-4.303; p<0.001), and unprovoked VTE (2.227; 1.471-2.983; p=0.001). In the establishment cohort, the sensitivity, specificity, Youden index (YI), and C-index were 85.5%, 79.7%, 0.652, and 0.821 (0.732-0.909) when using the original PRC score, whereas they were 87.9%, 74.6%, 0.625, and 0.807 (0.718-0.897) when using the simplified one, respectively (Kappa coefficient 0.819, p-value of McNemar's test 0.786). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity, specificity, YI, and C-index were 86.3%, 76.3%, 0.626, and 0.815 (0.707-0.923) when using the original PRC score, whereas they were 85.0%, 78.6%, 0.636, and 0.818 (0.725-0.911) when using the simplified one, respectively (Kappa coefficient 0.912, p-value of McNemar's test 0.937); both were better than that of the DASH score (72.5%, 69.5%, 0.420, and 0.621 [0.532-0.710]). CONCLUSIONS: A prediction score for CTED occurrence, termed PRC, predicted the likelihood of CTED occurrence after 3 or 6 months of standard anticoagulation in hospitalised patients with a diagnosis of acute PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=1,335). Prediction Rule for CTED (PRC) score vs. DASH score was evaluated on Prediction of CTED occurrence (C-index) (95% CI 0.707-0.923). The Prediction Rule for CTED (PRC) score accurately predicted CTED occurrence after acute pulmonary embolism, outperforming the DASH score in the validation cohort (C-index 0.815 vs 0.621).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: