Key result
Cardiac biomarkers and D-dimer effectively differentiate acute cardiothoracic from respiratory diseases in emergency settings.
Why the study?
Acute cardiothoracic and respiratory diseases presenting with chest pain and dyspnoea remain challenging to diagnose and differentiate in the emergency setting despite available clinical and imaging methods.
This review summarizes the utility of established and emerging biomarkers for the rapid differential diagnosis of acute chest pain and dyspnea in the emergency department.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ED biomarker use for acute chest pain and dyspnea; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Acute cardiothoracic and respiratory diseases frequently remain a challenge to diagnose and differentiate in the emergency setting. The main diseases that manifest with chest pain include ischaemic heart disease, myocarditis, acute pericarditis, aortic dissection/rupture and pulmonary embolism (PE). Diseases that primarily present with dyspnoea include heart failure (HF), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, asthma exacerbations and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pre-test probabilities of clinical findings play a vital part in diagnostic decisions, and the use of a Bayesian approach to these greatly improves the ability to stratify patients more accurately. However, blood tests (biomarkers) are increasingly used to assist in rapid decision-making in the emergency setting in combination with imaging methods such as chest radiograph, ultrasound and increasingly computed tomography, as well as physiological tests such as the electrocardiogram in addition to physical examination. Specific tests for ischaemic heart disease and myocarditis (cardiac troponins), HF (B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP)), aortic dissection (smooth muscle markers) and PE (D-dimer) have been developed. Surfactant protein-D and interleukin-8 have been developed for ARDS. Additionally, circulating microRNAs have emerged as promising biomarker candidates in cardiovascular disease. With this increasing array of biochemical markers to aid in the diagnosis of chest diseases presenting with chest pain and dyspnoea, we herein review the clinical usefulness of these markers, in particular in differentiating cardiac from pulmonary diseases. A symptom-oriented assessment as necessary for use in the critical setting is described in addition to discussion of individual biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2016) conducted a review in Acute cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. Biomarkers was evaluated. Biomarkers such as cardiac troponins, natriuretic peptides, and D-dimer are clinically useful for diagnosing and differentiating acute cardiothoracic and respiratory diseases in the emergency setting.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: