Key result
Prophylactic percutaneous mechanical circulatory support during TAVI was associated with lower periprocedural mortality compared to rescue insertion (P=0.013).
Why the study?
The use and outcomes of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support during TAVI from high-volume centers needed to be evaluated.
Does prophylactic percutaneous mechanical circulatory support improve survival compared to rescue insertion in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI?
Observational (n=87)
Yes
Does prophylactic percutaneous mechanical circulatory support improve survival compared to rescue insertion in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI?
Prophylactic use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support during high-risk TAVI is associated with lower periprocedural mortality compared to emergent rescue insertion.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use and outcomes of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) utilized during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from high-volume centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our international multicenter registry including 13 high-volume TAVI centers with 87 patients (76.5 ± 11.8 years, 63.2% men) who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis and required pMCS (75.9% VA-ECMO, 19.5% Impella CP, 4.6% TandemHeart) during the procedure (prior to TAVI 39.1%, emergent rescue 50.6%, following TAVI 10.3%). The procedures were considered high-risk, with 50.6% having severe left ventricular dysfunction, 24.1% biventricular dysfunction, and 32.2% severe pulmonary hypertension. In-hospital and 1-year mortality were 27.5% and 49.4%, respectively. Patients with prophylactic hemodynamic support had lower periprocedural mortality compared to patients with rescue insertion of pMCS (log rank = 0.013) and patients who did not undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the TAVI procedure had better short and long term survival (log rank <0.001 and 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Given the overall survival rate and low frequency of pMCS-related complications, our study results support the use of pMCS prophylactically or during the course of TAVI (bailout) in order to improve clinical outcomes in high-risk procedures or in case of acute life-threatening hemodynamic collapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orvin et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis requiring TAVI (n=87). Prophylactic percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) vs. Rescue insertion of pMCS was evaluated on Periprocedural mortality (p=0.013). Prophylactic percutaneous mechanical circulatory support during TAVI was associated with lower periprocedural mortality compared to rescue insertion (P=0.013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: