Key result
Stopping antithrombotics after upper GI bleeding is linked to ~232% higher mortality and thrombotic risk.
Why the study?
The practice of stopping antithrombotic therapy after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and its impact on clinical outcomes were unclear.
Does cessation of antithrombotic therapy at discharge increase mortality and thrombotic events in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding?
Cohort (n=118)
No
Does cessation of antithrombotic therapy at discharge increase mortality and thrombotic events in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding?
Hazard Ratio: 3.32 (95% CI 1.07–10.31)
p-value: p=0.027
Discontinuing antithrombotic therapy after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is associated with significantly higher mortality and thrombotic events without a significant reduction in rebleeding.
Restarting antithrombotics before AUGIB discharge may reduce thrombotic mortality; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Antithrombotic drugs are often stopped following acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) and frequently not restarted. The practice of antithrombotic discontinuation on discharge and its impact on outcomes are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether restarting antithrombotic therapy, prior to hospital discharge for AUGIB, affected clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital between May 2013 and November 2014, with median follow-up of 259 days. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent gastroscopy for AUGIB while on antithrombotic therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Continuation or cessation of antithrombotic(s) at discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Cause-specific mortality, thrombotic events, rebleeding and serious adverse events (any of the above). RESULTS: Of 118 patients analysed, antithrombotic treatment was stopped in 58 (49.2%). Older age, aspirin monotherapy and peptic ulcer disease were significant predictors of antithrombotic discontinuation, whereas dual antiplatelet use predicted antithrombotic maintenance. The 1-year postdischarge mortality rate was 11.3%, with deaths mainly due to thrombotic causes. Stopping antithrombotic therapy at the time of discharge was associated with increased mortality (HR 3.32; 95% CI 1.07 to 10.31, P=0.027), thrombotic events (HR 5.77; 95% CI 1.26 to 26.35, P=0.010) and overall adverse events (HR 2.98; 95% CI 1.32 to 6.74, P=0.006), with effects persisting after multivariable adjustment for age and peptic ulcer disease. On subgroup analysis, the thromboprotective benefit remained significant with continuation of non-aspirin regimens (P=0.016). There were no significant differences in postdischarge bleeding rates between groups (HR 3.43, 0.36 to 33.04, P=0.255). CONCLUSION: In this hospital-based study, discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy is associated with increased thrombotic events and reduced survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siau et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) (n=118). Stopping antithrombotic therapy vs. Continuation of antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on Mortality (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.07 to 10.31, p=0.027). Stopping antithrombotic therapy at discharge after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with increased mortality (HR 3.32; 95% CI 1.07-10.31; P=0.027) and thrombotic events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: