Why the study?
Whether to continue or discontinue anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy after gastrointestinal bleeding is debated, and no consensus exists regarding comparative efficacies.
Does the continuation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy improve mortality and thromboembolic outcomes compared to discontinuation in patients after gastrointestinal bleeding?
Does the continuation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy improve mortality and thromboembolic outcomes compared to discontinuation in patients after gastrointestinal bleeding?
Continuing anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy after gastrointestinal bleeding is associated with lower thromboembolic and mortality events but higher recurrent GI bleeding compared to discontinuation.
May favor restart after GI bleed despite rebleed risk; leaves open RCTs to confirm net benefit from observational data.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Long-term anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy is widely used for the management of thromboembolic conditions. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common collateral manifestation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy that complicates its administration. The continuation or discontinuation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy after an episode of gastrointestinal bleeding has been a matter of debate. Despite recent positive reports from retrospective cohort studies suggesting a reduction in morbidity- and mortality-related outcomes with continued administration of anticoagulant/antithrombotic agents (even after gastrointestinal bleeding), no consensus or comparisons about the efficacies of continued or discontinued antithrombotic administration exist. Therefore, we developed this current state-of-evidence analysis evaluating the comparative effects of continuation and discontinuation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic drugs after gastrointestinal bleeding on the overall incidences of gastrointestinal bleeding, thromboembolic events and mortality events. METHODS: We performed a systematic academic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases: Web of Science, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and MEDLINE. Moreover, we conducted a random effect meta-analysis to compare the effects of continuation and discontinuation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic drugs after an event of gastrointestinal bleeding on the overall incidences of gastrointestinal bleeding, thromboembolic events and mortality events. RESULTS: We found seven eligible studies (from 1397 candidates) with 2532 participants (mean age, 73.1 ± 4.1 years). Our meta-analysis revealed lower odds of thromboembolic events (OR, -0.21), mortality outcomes (OR, -0.39) and an increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 2.4) in the group with continued anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy than in the group discontinuing the therapy. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: We provide an updated evidence on the comparative effects between continuation and discontinuation of anticoagulant/antithrombotic drugs after gastrointestinal bleeding events based on the overall incidences of gastrointestinal bleeding, thromboembolic events and mortality events. This study reports confirm an overall lower incidence of thromboembolic events and mortality outcomes for the continuation group than for the discontinuation group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: