Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an indoor smoke-free bylaw in Toronto, Ontario, implemented June 2004. METHODS: We used a pre-post comparison design to assess secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among 79 eligible bar workers in Toronto, Ontario (bylaw enacted), and 49 eligible bar workers in a control community, Windsor, Ontario (no bylaw change), at four times: preban, and 1, 2, and 9 months postban. RESULTS: SHS exposure time and urinary cotinine level were substantially reduced in Toronto bar workers immediately after the ban by 94% (from 7.8 to 0.5 hours) and 68% (from 24.2 to 7.8 ng/mL), respectively. The reduction was sustained throughout follow-up. There was no change among Windsor bar workers before and after the ban. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the ban was high, and the ban led to a substantial reduction in SHS exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bondy et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: