Systematic review shows favorable perioperative safety and complete tumor margins in metastatic rectal cancer, indicating robotic synchronous resection is feasible.
Synchronous rectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer offers a unique opportunity to treat patients with a single stage procedure. Traditional open resections were out of favour due to a high morbidity profile. Robotic resections offer these benefits with an apparent reduction in morbidity and similar oncological outcomes. The present review aims to ascertain the feasibility, safety and available outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases. A systematic review was performed along the PRISMA guidelines with “robotic”, “rectal cancer”, “colorectal”, “synchronous resection” and “liver metastases” as the key words on the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Appropriate studies published between May 1st 2015 and May 1st 2023 were chosen and the data were collated from individual patients and analysed. A total of 12 studies were included, comprising of 48 patients. Eight included studies were case series and the rest were case reports and brief communications. There were no appropriate prospective studies for analysis. The median age was 61 years (IQR- 55–73years) and 80% of patients whose gender data were available (n-15) were men. The median operative duration was 376 min (IQR- 312–424min) with estimated blood loss of 175 ml (125–225 ml). The median length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (IQR- 3.5-7). There was no mortality and all the resections were R0. Synchronous robotic resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases is feasible on the current review and has good short term and peri-operative outcomes. However, there is paucity of high quality published data in this subset of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of the current review and to resolve the lack of high quality evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pathanki et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: