Key result
Axetis SiO2-coated stents reduce neointimal area and improve vasodilation versus BMS over 6 months.
Why the study?
The safety, efficacy, and vascular physiology effects of the Axetis silicon dioxide inert-coated stent compared with bare metal stents were evaluated in a randomised preclinical setting.
Does Axetis silicon dioxide inert-coated stent implantation improve vascular healing and reduce neointimal area compared to bare metal stents in domestic pigs?
RCT (n=44)
Randomized
Does Axetis silicon dioxide inert-coated stent implantation improve vascular healing and reduce neointimal area compared to bare metal stents in domestic pigs?
In a preclinical swine model, the Axetis silicon dioxide-coated stent demonstrated reduced neointimal hyperplasia and improved endothelial function compared to a bare metal stent.
AIMS: To evaluate the short-, mid- and long-term safety, efficacy and vascular physiology of Axetis silicon dioxide (SiO2, abrading the micropores) inert-coated stent implantation in a randomised preclinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary arteries of domestic pigs were randomised to receive either Axetis or BMS (same design) stents with one-, three- and six-month follow-up (FUP), controlled by coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and histology (n=32). The time-dependent vasomotor reaction of coronary arteries to stenting was measured using modified myography (n=12). Complete endothelialisation of the Axetis stent was confirmed by OCT, IVUS and histology at one-month FUP. Histopathology revealed continuous healing of the vessel wall with a gradual reduction of inflammation and fibrin score during the six-month FUP in both stent types. Significantly smaller neointimal area and %area stenosis were measured in Axetis stents compared with BMS at each FUP time point. Vascular reactivity measurements showed significantly better endothelium-dependent vasodilation of stented arteries with Axetis implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the Axetis SiO2-coated stent resulted in a significantly better safety, efficacy and vessel physiology profile compared with BMS of the same design with a continuous decrease in vessel inflammation during the six-month FUP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pávó et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Preclinical model (domestic pigs) (n=44). Axetis silicon dioxide (SiO2) inert-coated stent vs. Bare metal stent (BMS) was evaluated on Neointimal area, %area stenosis, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Axetis SiO2-coated stents resulted in significantly smaller neointimal area and %area stenosis, and better endothelium-dependent vasodilation compared with bare metal stents over 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: