Key result
Intraoperative TXA in CAD patients undergoing arthroplasty shows no MIs and similar VTE rates versus controls.
Why the study?
Many surgeons believe tranexamic acid increases myocardial infarction risk in patients with coronary artery disease or coronary stents undergoing total joint arthroplasty, but safety data are limited.
Does intraoperative tranexamic acid increase the risk of myocardial infarction or VTE in patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents undergoing total joint arthroplasty?
Cohort (n=26,808)
No
Does intraoperative tranexamic acid increase the risk of myocardial infarction or VTE in patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents undergoing total joint arthroplasty?
Intraoperative tranexamic acid appears safe and does not increase the risk of myocardial infarction or VTE in patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents undergoing total joint arthroplasty.
May support tranexamic acid safety in CAD arthroplasty patients; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is increasingly used to minimize blood loss during total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although TXA has been shown to be highly effective in reducing operative blood loss, many surgeons believe that it places patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or a history of coronary stents at an increased risk for myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to determine if TXA is safe to use in patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis at a single, tertiary academic medical center identifying consecutive total hip and knee arthroplasty cases over an 8-year period. From this cohort who received TXA intraoperatively, we identified patients with a history of CAD or coronary stents and determined the total myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates within a 90-day postoperative period. Chi-square analyses were used to identify differences in VTE rates between cohorts. A post hoc power analysis was also performed to determine whether our results were powered to detect a difference in VTE rates. RESULTS: In the 26,808 identified at-risk patients, there were no postoperative myocardial infarctions. No significant differences were observed for VTE rates compared with the control cohort using either topical or intravenous TXA, with regard to CAD (0.29% compared with 0.76%; p = 0.09) or coronary stents (0% compared with 0.76%; p = 0.14). Moreover, there was no significant difference observed in VTE rates when administration was subcategorized into intravenous and topical methods with regard to CAD (0.13% compared with 0.72%; p = 0.12) or coronary stents (0% compared with 0%; p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, topical and intravenous TXA were equally safe when used in patients with a history of CAD and coronary stents in comparison with the control cohort. With equal efficacy and risk of adverse events, we recommend intravenous TXA, which may enable easier institutional implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zak et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (CAD) or coronary stents in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (n=26,808). Tranexamic acid (TXA) vs. Control cohort was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 90 days in patients with CAD (p=0.09). Intraoperative tranexamic acid in patients with CAD undergoing joint arthroplasty resulted in no myocardial infarctions and similar 90-day VTE rates compared to controls (0.29% vs 0.76%; p=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: